I found those conceptual frameworks fascinating. I'm not sure I fully agree with the authors' framing of the three types of freedom, but it's a starting point to examine what freedom actually means. I also appreciated the framing of equality, which can mean as diverse things as "everyone is equally miserable under the king," "everyone is exactly the same," and "everyone is such a fuckin' weirdo that there can't be any sort of hierarchy." Obviously the last one is the kind of equality my ideal society would have.

I also really like the framing of rights vs. responsibilities that I think I encountered in Chelsea Vowel's writing?