agoodwinsmith: (Default)
Well.  Let me get this right off my chest straight away: If Lynch (1984) had been given the budget of both special effects and how long he could make his cinematic journey, there is no doubt whose film would shine like the sun. 

Lynch got 137 minutes to get Paul to the Emperor's crown.

Villeneuve got 155 minutes + 166 minutes to get Paul to the Emperor's crown.

137 minutes (2.29 hours)  VS  321 minutes (5.35 hours).  This Villeneuve cr ..... eation better be more than just lucky.

~

Spoilers

~

~

~

~

I recently watched both Villeneuve films back to back on TV, with commercial breaks, which never does any movie any favours.  Dark tenebrous screens fade to black in a daylit room.  I suspect it would have been similarly murky in theatre, but maybe it was effectively moody and beautifully broodingly bodeful.

[Continuation several days later.]

Actually, I have watched these again, and I now understand that daytime viewing is not recommended.  There are some beautiful things, beautifully shown.  I was struck by how the visual team used some portions of a culture without tipping over into implying that it is the culture in the future.  For instance, the Harkonen world, especially of the Baron, uses the black lacquer of Japanese esthetic, while using the white facial make up, and the view of the baron's neck nape, like is shown in a Geisha's kimono, in an eerie way, while never suggesting that this is future Japanese culture.
.
One thing I do think that Lynch got wrong was his characterization of the Baron.  Lynch makes him into a gross fat fool, which makes Duke Leto's fall to his machinations weak and pathetic.  Leto should have been able to think rings around that pus-filled drooler.  I grant that Villeneuve's Baron is much more frightening and Machivellian, easily able to outmaneuver a reasonably capable Duke Leto.  Stellan Skasgard for the win.

I *do* object to the Villeneuve butchering of the Chani character.  She is not so petty and unsophisticated as Zandeya's Chani is written.  Yes, she is a tough warrior, and yes, she is a wild being, but no, she isn't ignorant of marriages of alliance.

I also object to Villeneuve's Stilgar.  Stilgar believes in the Lisan Al Gib (spelling) in spite of himself.  He too is more discerning and sophisticated than Bordan's Stilgar is written.  He doesn't wallow in the "godly" mysticism of it all.  He is compelled to believe and it annoys him.

And I won't even talk about Villeneuve's numb bumbling around the character of Alia.  No Gom Jabbar for Alia?  Bah.

I do like Sharon Duncan Brewster as Villeneuve's Dr. Liet Kynes.  I think that works very well.  It also makes a nonsense of Villeneuve's sietch culture.  Obviously *some* people are going to the equivalent of university and they aren't just dusty warriors with swords, nay scimitars.  I like the/my conceit that Lynch's Max Von Sydow's Kynes could be the spouse (assuming age matching) of Sharon Duncan Brewster's Kynes.  The outside the sietch version matched with the inside the sietch version - and both et by worms. 

All in all, I feel that Villeneuve's version suffers from all of us knowing the story.  I kept waiting for particular lines (For the father, nothing.) or events, and they didn't happen.  I do think the combat training at the beginning of the novel is critical for understanding how young Paul really is, and how extremely trained he is in very focused ways.   And while Villeneuve does make Jessica freaky, he doesn't make her or any of the other Bene Gesserits frightening.  They should have been widdle-your-drawers frightening, and they weren't.  I mean, think of Lynch's Sian Phillips's Reverend Mother Gaius Helen Mohiam - very scary.

And think of Lynch's Brad Dourif's Pitre De Vries.  I mean we spend a lot of time in the head of Pitre in the novel.  He deserves more care than Villeneuve's  two lines from a black dot on the lower lip of the mouth in a white Italian Harlequin make up face.  Shall I *talk* about Linda Hunt's Shadout Mapes compared to Villeneuve's who doesn't even get the dignity of blooding the blade before resheathing?  Hah.

And the ending of Villeneuve's Dune Part Two just started hacking at characters and events, until it was just: no.

So.

It's pretty, but no depth.

agoodwinsmith: (Default)
 I would like to invite everyone to remember the sign off of Looney Tunes cartoons by Porky Pig.  I do believe the graphics for the white hole/ black hole, as we see them, with a cloud band as a stage across the front, is meant to remind us of "That's All, Folks!"

And it was never "All" - there would always be another cartoon in front of another movie.

And *THAT* means that "The Space Baby" was likely Porky Pig.

If they can avoid more gimmick episodes for the final five, then this will indeed have been "all".[1]


[1] - does anybody know -> did Looney Tunes end up owned by Desilu?
agoodwinsmith: (Default)
This doesn't really deserve SPOILERS because it appears to be a complete fantasy on my part, but this is in regard to Tomorrow's Enterprise.

~

~

~

I *swear* that during my first viewing of the episode, while live, that I saw the following:  Present day Uhura is in the future sickbay with future Chapel, future Boyce, and future Kirk.  Uhura addresses Kirk three times, as follows: Jim;  Admiral; Captain.  Kirk responds to Admiral with "Admiral?" 

I've watched the episode again twice, and that event is not anywhere at all.  It was all in my head.  Yes, I saw the similar scene where it is Pike instead of Kirk, but during my first viewing my scene was additional.  The only thing I can think of is that sometimes I close my eyes, and I think I am just listening with my eyes closed, but later evidence determines that I was actually lightly asleep.

So, my evidence for a third time line being hinted evaporates.  Shoot.

I have to say that I think the action was pretty slow (almost boring), and the orchestral flourishes very ornamental and full of harps.  Conducive to snoozing, as it were.[1]

[1] - therefore: not my fault

agoodwinsmith: (Default)
~

And TOS S2 E14 Wolf in the Fold

~

Spoilers

~

~

~

~

Split time-lines: perfect.  This solves all my fusses about how they are going to mesh up with TOS.  Well: apparently some time lines will mesh better than others, and I can live with that. 

I also like the idea that it was more than two time lines.  We've got Captain Pike, and Captain Kirk, and possibly Admiral Kirk.  The Admiral Kirk part was never explained, and it could have been a private joke between one pair of Kirk/Uhura and not the other.  Or it could be a third time line.

The birth of a what from a what is meant to be all beyond our understanding, but it does sort of imply a disembodied uterus/vaginal canal - or a tubey hole from which new life springs fully formed and not needing to suckle.  Okay.

I really admire the make-up team getting Gooding to look very Uhura-like, and I think Gooding did a good job of taming the cheerleader and becoming the character we know from TOS.

I really like the young Scotty, too.

So, I am glad the SNW episode allows for multiple versions of the TOS characters because as I have been rewatching TOS episodes more methodically, I have become really troubled by the 60's mores.  That's my formative years, and I just swam like a fish in the toxic soup - as we all did - and thought nothing of some really questionable givens at the time.

I just rewatched Wolf in the Fold, where Scotty, while visiting a pleasure planet, is possessed by the spirit of Jack the Ripper and kills three women.  This is a story about Scotty, and so we are focused on proving Scotty's innocence, but the deaths of the women are treated like the loss of a favorite shirt.  Spock also says that the possessing spirit choses to kill women instead of men because women are more easily frightened and their terror is more heightened than men's.  No one mentions what it's like to wake up to having murdered someone you know.  And no one mentions mourning the women even one little bit.  It's really creepy.

So, while I think they are skillfully arcing back to the TOS, I think it would be more fun to carry on with alternate time line characters.

And hey.  Isn't this called Strange New *Worlds*, not Strange Visits to a Character's Head?  Where are the worlds of skimpily clad influencers oppressed by an evil AI, which controls them through a rigid evil cult?  Eh?

agoodwinsmith: (Default)
So.

While Carney is talking investments, and the great Canadian unwashed are yearning wistfully for a long lost gap year in Provence, I suspect what is happening is that Canada is hoping to poach all the plumbers and other trades needed to build big projects and housing and pipelines and airports in under-served areas.

Yes, Canada has announced money for a trades training program (which I note does not compel industry to supply the full four years of apprenticeship placements, by der way), but it will be four years minimum before freshly minted Red Seals will be available for opportunities in remote areas with a company store.

So that means that the Red Seal credential will be under pressure to accept quickly evaluated equivalencies from "abroad", even though the Red Seal system is the only thing that lets trades work in a Canadian province other than their training province.  Hmm.

The incense of metaphoric romance nearly covers the aroma of the burning of sacrifices on the altar of commerce.  Jolly good.

That gap year in Provence better be damn good.
agoodwinsmith: (Default)
So.  We are all aflutter because the European Union wants a closer relationship that might include trade even though 10 of the 27 members haven't yet ratified the trade agreement floating around since 2017 (CETA).  Ish.

As Althia Raj says, it's all very well, but Canada wants to send things Europe isn't interested in[1], because, as Emilie Nicolas says, "Yeah, I think in a way this whole thing is going back to the basics of Canada where Europe wanted furs and fancy top hats, so there goes our beavers.  So then it was that Europe needed newspapers - they thought newspapers were great - so there goes Canadian forests.  So now it is critical minerals, this new thing, but I do expect that this idea of Canada as this vast infinite reserve of natural resources could still be part of the European imagination.  So, the extractivism part of it is granted, but I'm interested in what is going to be new.  Smaller European cars?  Smaller European appliances?"[2]

And don't get me started on this greedy little plan to privatize Canadian airports.  If Airports make enough money to pay a dividend, why isn't that money going back into the public purse?  Apparently, we need to use the sale money to build other assets, like airports in poorly served areas.  Hmmm.  But even so, when I take a second mortgage to cover the cost of building a garage, the house is collateral and is only collected if I fail my payments.  I am not selling part of my house to the bank.

Huh.  You can tell the politicians are lying because their lips are moving.

I still believe Carney is the better choice of the two available, but we're going to regret him.


[1] - badly paraphrased from At Issue on the CBC on 17Sept26

[2] - transcribed badly from Rosemary Barton Live on the CBC on 20Sept26

[3] - maybe we could be the Royal Purple or the Eastern Star or the Rotary Anns or ...
agoodwinsmith: (Default)
~
Spoileroonies

~

~

~

~

~ 

I want to be annoyed with this episode so much: just another trick.  But any episode that smoothly allows Carol Kane to say, "As you wish." and "Max? He's a Miracle Worker." in the same episode gets a great big pass.

I could have wished that we had gotten a more "regular" Star Trek and then were rewarded with this episode either as the end of this season, or the beginning of the final season.

I like the idea that Pelia has gone off with this ship/world, where there happens to be a Miracle Max, and this might be how we get The Princess Bride.  I don't need this to be true, but I will allow it.  I also note that this then allows it to become the location of Men in Tights.  I like the idea that this then becomes a vacation location where everybody's jokey medieval fantasy can exist. [1 edit]  I am very fond of Pelia saying that she lived through medieval times, and the ship/world smells much less of manure and death.

I really enjoyed the costumes - swirly dresses and lean tunics - but this is the Junk Food of Trek and I'm hungry for Meat and Potatoes Trek.

Oh yes, I also really like that when the Red Queen becomes the Red Dragon, she stands up like a chicken at first.  A big red chicken, yes, but still.  :)

[1 edit] - 19Sep26, 9:58 BC time - such as Pratchett's Discworld.  Not a full novel, but a vignette.

agoodwinsmith: (Default)
Also Star Trek TOS S1 E 29, Operation - Annihilate!

SPOILERS

~

~

~

~

~

I feel that Uhura's arc is very much like the arc of us as viewers: we've been so accustomed to trick episodes, that we aren't thinking about regular life in a regular space opera.  We - meaning: I - forgot that Uhura went to Star Fleet Academy, and played those team games of scrabbling around in the dirt and taking stunner fire.  I forgot that under that Cheerleader pep is the woman that also has it in her to become the alternate universe Uhura who plots and stabs.  I forgot that she is the Uhura who, as a black woman, openly, to his face, expressed her exasperation with her white male boss in TOS S1 E 29, Operation Annihilate.[1] [2] So she is totally the woman who can concoct a spur of the moment plot to outwit and kill the blue pirate thieves.

This episode is more like the original TOS.  Questionable ethical decisions.  Information revealed, but we are aware of further secrets continuing in concealment.  We seem to be further away from Kirk in the chair, but we are also seeing several people's comfort being disturbed, and how several characters could be eased off stage.

One of the general things that I think SNW does well are back of scene details.  In this episode suddenly a senior officer, in this case the admiral, is being accompanied by a Yeoman.  In the TOS episode, Kirk asks a Yeoman to provide a transcript of all events.  It is as though Admiral Seeger's tampering with the past ship's digital record has been found out by the time of this timeline-later TOS episode, and a move to add an additional analogue record has occurred.  Even in the TOS era episodes, they were relying on camera records for evidence, so it is not like analogue recording wouldn't have been a dated method[4].

Also in this episode we see Scotty in "a dress".  It's the longer tunic that some of the women have occasionally worn.  It makes sense that a kilt-wearing person might not feel that a longer tunic was wrongly coded for himself, but it is a nice dig at the Star Fleet Academy whiners who faint every time they see Jay-Den's shapely knee.

A flaw in the writing for me is the scene of all the senior officers of both adventures in the ready room, where the accusations of drugging occur.  I was surprised to see the admiral standing upright, and still mostly in charge.  I don't think La'An will escape shooting an admiral.  I don't think Pike will dodge a direct order from an admiral.  I think in his flailing, Admiral Seeger will cause Sam Kirk to choose his family on a remote station.

I am not sure what I think about Vulcan A'sha leaving.  I mean, we knew she was going to because her initial reaction to shipboard life was "ew yuckie" - but logically, of course.  I had high hope that Scotty expecting her to shift her butt and engage with the problem ('You're not helping." followed by an exasperated facial expression did seem to galvanize her.) might have hooked her.  The thing that cheerleader Uhura never does is ask A'Sha to share her logic, so she could either see it or pick at it.  Not engaging it at all is rather insulting.  I liked the character, and I'm sorry she was just a foil for showing that Uhura's emotional impetus saved the day.  Yay Emotional Human Beans.  Also, A'Sha has been at risk of death three times in as few weeks, and things seemed to be escalating - normal people need to know when, as T'Pring said, not to argue with the laws of physics - or chance..




[1] - I don't think people remember how world normalizing Roddenberry's Uhura is/was.  I was nine and ten and eleven.  People my age and younger have never lived in a world where a black woman couldn't be on the bridge as an equal team member.  Okay, she was still ickily *female* (ew) and our culture is still working on that, but shows had to begin to budge on black inclusion because that unconscious cultural thing (the narrative  stuff I've been on and on about regarding Holy Green Luigi) was expecting a black presence somewhere equal-adjacent.  We didn't and aren't doing it gracefully, but the limits continue to budge. 

[2] - I watched TOS S1 E29 as a match for this episode because it is about Kirk's brother Sam.  I was not shocked with Uhura's response to Kirk when I saw it at age ten - I thought she was right and he should have been sorry enough to say so.[3]  In this recent viewing, I am boggled that it didn't raise big eyebrows at the time.  Maybe it did, & I just didn't live where it did.

[3] - okay, this just proves I didn't understand military hierarchy either, and should have also been shocked that she back talked a ranking officer.  Anyway.

[4] - however, in truth, in the 60's, we couldn't yet imagine a senior male not having a secretary, so bring on the Yeoman beings, with their clipboards and ink  pens.  So it was a failing of the era.  Hubba hubba.

agoodwinsmith: (Default)
Oh Goddess, I am going to barf myself to death.

I just saw an advertizement on the TV for a program called The Zoomer.  It's for the Boomer with Zip.

Definitely going to puke myself inside out. 

Oh barf barf barf, ralph ralph ralph, herk herk herk.

Where's my fucking fainting couch, already?

agoodwinsmith: (Default)

~

Spoilers

~

~

~

~

~

~

Well.

In general I am underwhelmed.  However, I will watch Sybok the pirate[1] and La'An, his piratess, do heaving bosom and shirtless romance covers *forever*, yes.

I really appreciate how much effort was put into finding an actor physically similar to the original Trelane.  Unfortunately, the original character had more charm, more of an obsessive adolescent approach.  Someone around 14.  This feels like someone around age 8.  It feels clunky - which I suppose is the nature of soap operas.[2].

I *think* there might be an effort to echo "Through the Looking Glass" in the title, which, sure, okay.  I have looked it up and now know that chronitons are "subatomic particles of time energy".  Fine.  Little granular things falling through the pinch of an egg timer.

And I understand why the actors enjoy these episodes.  A chance to show the chops, and novelty keeps the characters fresh, right?

But all these emotional character arcs are one-sided and leave an unsatisfactory constipated feeling.  I feel like we are spinning our tires and waiting for our onramp to TOS.  I wish they would break free, and alternate timeline themselves into lots more episodes.


[1] - for some reason, the Sybok looks like the Spock is a librarian who has removed the glasses and flipped the hair.  ;)

[2] - the last soap opera I followed was Dark Shadows[3], back in the late 60's - yes, it was timed so that kids could race home and catch it.  I don't dare get into soaps, or I will do nothing else.  Nope.

[3] - it was super weird.  It made no sense whatsoever, but it had atmosphere in sacks.

agoodwinsmith: (Default)
I need more Cadet A'Sha (Bianca Nugara/Bia Nugara).  I especially like the dynamic between A'Sha and Scotty.

~

Spoilers

~

~

~

~

I enjoyed the action plot.  I enjoyed seeing Pelia coach Scotty to become the Scotty we know.  I enjoyed watching characters slowly getting placed where we will find them in TOS.

However, the tension of the crisis was blunted even more than our usual expectations that none of our favourites will be lost, except maybe some red shirts.  For heck sakes, we've got Spock, Uhura, Chapel, M'Benga, Boyes, Number One, and even Pike who all need to be present and functional at the beginning of TOS, not to mention the Enterprise itself, so there is no way this has a chance to become nail biting because nothing is at risk.

I am worried that there is going to be a massive kill off of extraneous to TOS requirements.  I'd rather we had a reassignment, and then follow both crews.

Yes. I want all the possible Trek, all the time.
agoodwinsmith: (Default)
Third viewing and:

I would watch the hell out of a T'Pring spin-off.  It must be Gia Sandhu.  I really really love that the theme music from Amok Time (TOS, S2 E1) has been turned into T'Pring's theme.[1]

I don't know how that would work in the Star Trek universe, and I don't care.  WANT.

Anyhoo.  Spoilers.

~

~

~

~

I was ready to be irked/tired of the continuous trick episodes - what will they do next to top this?  Cirque du Soleil episode?  We've been to Toronto, why not Montreal?  Bungee cords for everyone!  Including T'Pring!

But I do think they handled this very well.  The puppets were fun, the Orions were fun, and, well, we know how I feel about T'Pring.

I am concerned about poor Spock's mental health, though.  He's been having some seriously resolving conversations with various imaginary T'Prings.  Meeting the real one, and expecting his imagined changes will be tough.

One thing I am disgruntled about, though, is that the last time we saw T'Pring, she was leaving because Spock did not share with her that he had been transformed entirely into a human being, and now it is being said it is because he left to explore his human side.  It results in the same ensuing episodes, but it changes the active agent.  It matters, and I don't think the writers see the difference.  It's all for the lulz, I guess.

I will watch this one frequently, but hey.  On the other hand: T'Pring!!!.


[1] - yes, yes, yes !  <gleeful scrubbing of hands>
agoodwinsmith: (Default)
Okay.

I am creeped out because I didn't think TV worked this way.

I expect my computer to betray me to other internet things, and so if ads for things I've been recently rabbit-holing about then appear, it's annoying but no longer creepy.

As you know, what with beet greens and beet not-rum, I've been rabbit-holing beets.  I just saw an ad for a beet product in a TV ad.

!!!!!

Are TV ads not pre-canned, loaded early and unchangeably?

If my TV programs start serving up current rabbit-hole adjacent ads, I'm going to have to swear off TV.  Too creepy.  I know it shouldn't be any different than ads in my Facebook, but this is a creep too far.
agoodwinsmith: (Default)
I was trying to find out the most common starch to be fermented into gin, and Google wouldn't do anything but wax lyrical about juniper and botanicals, which, yes, yum, but if I wanted to plant a crop to become gin, I wouldn't be waffling around with juniper bushes, nor fragrant foliage.  Eventually it was revealed that the base alcohol is a neutral spirit most often made from grain, and sometimes potatoes.

I was looking for this because there is a new (to me) grain in town, Kernza[1], which is exciting because it is perennial and thus doesn't need to be planted every year, saving planting costs.  It also has super long deep roots, so it holds the soil in place and helps retain water.  It also means that the plants are not removed at harvest, and so the ground is never bare, gone on the wind[2].  The plant produces grain (a bunch grass seed), and hay stuff as fodder for feed.  It is a relative of wheat, but not exactly wheat.  Less gluten, smaller grain size.  It grows well in colder climes[3]

Someone is already making whisky with it:  https://smokyvalleydistillery.com/blog/what-is-kernza

So I was thinking about what starches are most commonly used for alcohol fermentation, and it's:

whisky          wheat
beer              barley
rye whisky    rye
bourbon        sweet corn
vodka           potato
rum              sugar cane
gin               any old thing

So then I wondered why there isn't a booze linked to beets[4].  Something pink, delicately botanicalled with dill, eh?

Google google google - oh.  Apparently it is ersatz rum, not allowed to be called rum[5].


[1] - name patented, and researched mercilessly, and ultimately to be controlled completely for the benefit of stockholders, don't you worry 
https://kernza.org/
https://landinstitute.org/our-work/perennial-crops/kernza/
[2] - did you see what I did there?  *snortle*
[3] - which, face facts, folks, means less and less each day
[4] - and turnips, now that I think of it, but where's the romance (or comedy) in that, eh?  I wonder whether turnips/swedes/rutabagas weren't the first starchers used in gin fermentation
[]5 - yes, yes - only sparkling disappointment
agoodwinsmith: (Default)
Somewhat whishy washy spoilers, but spoilers nonetheless

~

~

~

Wait.  No.  I've added more spoilery things about Star Fleet Academy and much of SNW

~

Okay.  I was going to moan about using the black and white of noir films and films like Casablanca[1] in order to make use of the fashions of the 40's.  I found it annoying in TOS episode Season 2 Episode 7, A Piece of the Action in 1968 because my uncles were still wearing clothes like that then, and I expected it was written in order to make use of already present wardrobes at the studio.  There was no reason the TOS story needed that style.  At first I didn't think the SNW story needed it either.  The Gin Joint quote and the mimicking of the "la Marseillaise" scene in Casablanca were not subtle hints, but I thought unearned.

However, last week I read an article by Carlyn Beccia

Has America Crossed the Asshole Threshold?
https://carlynbeccia.medium.com/has-america-crossed-the-asshole-threshold-1f96b7fe6be7

and today an article by Cory Doctorow

Surveillance vs guillotines
https://doctorow.medium.com/https-pluralistic-net-2026-08-11-tragedy-of-the-commoners-piketty-snowden-d6865c97797a

and I wonder if SNW isn't being covert.

Beccia argues that societies always reach the "I might as well cheat because everyone is cheating" phase just before their fall because it is the natural outcome of game theory.  We know about tit for tat, but it gets more complicated than that, and it ends up rewarding the all-cheating-all-the-time person.  She also argues that First world countries reached that point in the Gilded Age and only just avoided collapse because of non-power wielding "nobodies" joining mutual aid societies.  Service Clubs: Rotary; Order of the Royal Purple; Lions Club; Ladies auxiliary of many churches and hospitals; unions; The Legion, etc etc. [2] [3]

Doctorow argues from the perspective of Piketty's theory of capital, in that we are entering an end time/revolution time because the nature of capital is that it uncontrollably collects in incompetent-in-society-leading hands, so society usually gets guillotines as the only way to break the stranglehold.  The wealth-holders know this, so that is the reason for the insane spending on surveillance technology.

Doctorow argues that it would actually cost less to just fund hospitals and schools and libraries, etc to maintain societal equilibrium, but that wealth-holders just can't resist the cruelty and meddling, and would rather spend more on surveillance.  And ... guards will salute you if you pay them just a little bit more than anyone else in wage-peonage.  Beccia's review of long-play game theory leads to the same story - the people who have just can't resist cheating for more - which leads to societal implosion.

I think SNW is obliquely exploring totalitarianism, and whether escaping and running away is enough.  Since we know that ultimately the Klingons will lose their world (Star Fleet Academy) and will need to be offered a culturally-acceptable path to a new home world, what are we to think of them as Quasi-Nazis?

I think this was less wardrobe kink and more trying to investigate something that is becoming dangerous to notice.

Also - I think we are seeing the context for Kirk's ultimate rules schmules attitude.

Everybody and their dog on Enterprise (maybe not Spock) is holding back *something* from Star Fleet.  More and more "alpha shift" are valuing their own moral compass more than following Star Fleet's (guidance)rules.  Showing this in relation to Klingon empire building is interesting.

Oh yes, and chiaroscuro.[4]   It is an Italian term for the use of light and dark in works, but usually only used when the contrast between the two is extreme.  If we are metaphoring, is there a stark contrast between moral codes, here?  Maybe.  In the Klingon world we see here, there is loyalty to the Klingons or death, while in the Star Fleet world there seems to be a more close-enough-is-good-enough attitude.  Even Admiral April (hah) extends deniability to Pike.



[1] - huh.  First time I have ever thought about that as White House.  huh
[2] - this begs the question of whether this was a last-gasp effort to put off the inevitable - service clubs and churches started emptying out in the 70's, and many Christian denominations and clubs have lost buildings and clout.  The Legion is really struggling to stay afloat.  I am sorry.  They helped my grandparents move to Canada during a very difficult time.
[3] - yes, the "clubs" were as guilty of cheating outsiders as anyone - it's also the start of the KKK, after all
[4] - I have a tender spot in my heart for that word because it was the name of the student run literary magazine I helped start in university.  It was pretty good, but short-lived.
agoodwinsmith: (Default)
Someone mentioned this person somewhere I was mooching around.  Her early work here is from ten or so years ago.  The more recent work is from charity work about 4 years ago, and it is more polished, with more strings and things.  Her translations are almost singable without heavy coaching.  Nice.  :)   I think she should be filling venues.  (Easy for me to say.)


Bad Romance
 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Tzlh85rjalI&list=RDTzlh85rjalI&start_radio=1

Live Bad Romance

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kbaDfeEER_U

Let It Go

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zYXPriLXtn4&list=RDzYXPriLXtn4&start_radio=1

Love is a Battlefield

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jg3jiO099hM&list=RDJg3jiO099hM&start_radio=1

We're Not Gonna Take It

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ReYJNgp21NU&list=RDReYJNgp21NU&start_radio=1

Dream On

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A51iviJTxfI&list=RDA51iviJTxfI&start_radio=1

Born To be Wild

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F8gXK6jEI0M&list=RDF8gXK6jEI0M&start_radio=1

Baby Baby One More Time

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VaZOnMwz3GU&list=RDVaZOnMwz3GU&start_radio=1

No Scrubs

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bRqIpcRBlrs&list=RDbRqIpcRBlrs&start_radio=1

Hungry Like the Wolf

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QQmEszdMuV0&list=RDQQmEszdMuV0&start_radio=1
agoodwinsmith: (Default)
This has absolutely no Trek content whatsoever; it is just that I have occasionally wondered this, and now my wondering has coincided with a keyboard.

Why do we have the impulse to wave sticks around and expect them to do something?

Yes.  I know that our culture is steeped in stories of sorceresses and fairies and wizards having magic wands, and we do have conductors for groups of musicians, and while we don't expect the conductor's baton to shoot sparkles, we treat it as representing power.  Wiccan practitioners do also treasure their wands.  (Mine's cherry wood, which I made from orchard prunings; paws off.)

However, I don't believe in any physical stick, no matter how ancient or treasured or imbued, to have any practical zapping power, not even directing power, because it is the mind that does that.  Yes, I do believe in psychological woo-woo energy-pushing power, but no wand is going to produce a cup of tea, nor even a bag of Hawkins Cheezies, which I could really do with right now[1], no matter how much oomph is boomphed, stick or no

Royalty hold stick-like symbols of power, like the Egyptian Crook and Flail, but it is not because of what they can do, but of what they represent: the Pharaoh as provider.  Crook for getting animals, and flail for getting grain.  Pointing and waving has never been a thing that royalty does with its sticks.

Swords and knives, however, have been/are often waved prior to application, and also in flashy displays of GRRR!.

I don't know how we get from those places, to wanting to zap over distances from a stick.

I was just considering[2] any of the stories that I have seen from cultures not my own, and power from a powerful person is usually wielded by the person's body parts - like hands and palms of hands, and eyeballs and mouths.

Still.  Any time I hold a stick-like thing (Incense, anyone?), I still wave it around and tap things like I'm going to turn them into coachmen.  I wonder when we started to do that.

[1] - Not stoned.  Sadly.
[2] - Very cursory; I haven't seen much.  Too busy stewing over Trek.

agoodwinsmith: (Default)
Sorry - spoilers, spoilers, spoilers


~
~
~
~


Okay.  So I accept that Spock might be "inebriated" enough to think he was hallucinating James Kirk.  He has, after all, just recently imagined T'Pring, and committed damage to himself while "believing" it was T'Pring using the scissors.  Game pieces being moved is really small potatoes.  Even the final slap fits into the same type of experience as the T'Pring experience.

My question is: Now that we know James Kirk is real, and he spent his time with a Spock who appears to not keep secret his belief that Kirk is a hallucination, why do the planetary gases not affect Kirk?

Kirk says he is on holiday at Cesnar.  The gases are planetary, not just at the resort.  And even so, he seems to have been spending his time in the resort, so the gases should have got him.

Ortega's lack of inebriation is explained by the gases' effects being blocked by her negative emotions.  Is Kirk to be assumed to both have negative emotions and also be a seriously empathetic ear for Spock?  Very kind and open, actually.  And why does Kirk never get out of his uniform?  If it is because he views Starfleet as his family, then La'An should also have been in uniform.

In practical storytelling terms, I understand these quibbles keep the audience from knowing that Kirk is real.  But I think it is damn sloppy.

Okay, yes, Kirk asked for french fries, like he is stoned - but then he should really have asked for Doritos.  *nods*

(PS - yes, I looked up the yiddish meaning of "plotz".)

agoodwinsmith: (Default)
Spoilers with a side of spoilers

~

~

~


Okay, yes, massively silly.  As a story: who cares.  As bits - yes please.

Please note the call back to Scotty's appearance in Next Generation (Relics), when he is looking for some real scotch (not synthahol), and Data finds him Gynan's hidden bottle.  "What is it?"  "It's green."

I've decide I don't want a romance between Ortega and Scotty - I want them to become a united team of notorious pranksters.

Total Eclipse of the Heart as a Klingon Power Ballad, yes, thank you.  I expect to start seeing this as an option at select karioke bars.

And, as someone who loves bingo: mwahahaha!
agoodwinsmith: (Default)
So.  All three Pegg/Pine/Quinto/Saldana/Urban movies were on yesterday, so I finally watched them front to back.

Movies on TV[1] are just the worst.  The flow is broken at exactly the wrong time, so the urge to bail is encouraged.  I resisted and now I deserve a gold star.  And maybe a cookie.

My SODB-F[2] spot was the appearance of traffic cop/nazi officer caps on top of black uniforms for star fleet officers.  No hats.  Never.  And especially not those.  Those date from a period where there were heavy-duty rules about hats, and a person could get themselves shunned, possibly court marshalled for doing it wrong.

I got very tired of Pine being pummeled to a pulp.  I also got tired of super unrealistic action sequences since it means they can't lose no matter how dire.  So there is nothing at stake.  So.  This is not my time line, but its existence permits other timelines, so I can live with it, as long as I don't have to watch it.

I want think about casting comparing Trousers of Time with Strange New Worlds

ORIGINAL                             TOT                             SNW

Kirk/ Shatner                          Chris Pine                    Paul Wesley
Spock/ Nimoy                        Zachary Quinto            Ethan Peck
Uhura/ Nichols                      Zoe Saldana                 Celia Rose Gooding
McCoy/ Kelley                       Karl Urban                    missing
Chapel/ Barrett                      missing                         Jess Bush
Scott/ Doohan                       Simon Pegg                  Martin Quinn
Number One/ Barrett             missing                         Rebecca Romijn
Pike/ Hunter & Kenney          Bruce Greenwood         Anson Mount 
Sulu/ Takei                            John Cho                       missing
Chekov/ Koenig                     Anton Yelchin                missing


I prefer the Wesley Kirk to Pine because he has been written as showing more brain, and not burdened so much with rage.  I prefer the Peck Spock because he is very much in the style of his grandfather (!).  I'm not as crazy about the Gooding Uhura because she is a little too much cheerleadery[3] for my tastes.  Too perky.  I think the Quinn Scotty is given more range - and not burdened with a silly mascot.  I really like the Bush & Romijn versions of Barrett roles.  Anson Mount has the humour to play up the "hair", so that's a bonus.  The only TOT characters I prefer are Saldana and Urban.

So.  I guess I prefer ensemble acting in a non-action script, so that puts the action movie cast at a disadvantage.  Really, I just want more movies/episodes with the SNW crew.


[1] - I'm not buying streaming services.  First it's Five Bucks, and next it's First Born and All Yer Honey Forever.  No.
[2] - SODB-F = suspension of disbelief - fail
[3] - cheerleaders: not a big thing in my highschool, so I didn't angst to be one, or admire anyone who was one.[4]
[4] - it fact, cheerleading is weird to me like the Greek Changing of the Guards in Athens.  Both have pompoms, and there are severely right ways and wrong ways to do it - and I don't understand the allure.

Profile

agoodwinsmith: (Default)
agoodwinsmith

October 2026

S M T W T F S
    123
45678910
1112131415 1617
18192021222324
25262728293031

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Oct. 22nd, 2026 10:49 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios