agoodwinsmith: (Default)
[personal profile] agoodwinsmith
So, I was thinking that desalination technology was where to place my dollars.  However:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Desalination

Aside from the currently not cheap issue, some of the places that need water are uphill and inland.  And then there's the whole sucking seawater in at a rapid pace, destroying plankton and fish eggs and larva, and who knows what else.

Hmm.

Date: 2011-02-18 03:40 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] jessie-c.livejournal.com
I rather like the Iceberg Scheme (http://science.howstuffworks.com/environmental/earth/oceanography/icebergs-as-water.htm)or even the alternative super-supertanker scheme discussed in that article.

Date: 2011-02-19 02:49 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] moustachios.livejournal.com
Hm. How would they keep their theoretical iceberg from tipping over and crushing either the towboats or the super-supertanker? Those things flip over all the time.

... Actually, now that I think about it, there *is* a local company that harvests icebergs for vodka. Maybe the key here is not to target big bergs, but to send out big ships to scoop up lots of little bergs.

Date: 2011-02-19 04:14 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] jessie-c.livejournal.com
That's the gist of the tanker idea; load it up with bergy bits and let them melt on the trip home. The Iceberg idea I liked best involved what would otherwise be called an island: much larger in length and width than height. Most people think this (http://videotales.ca/blog/wp-content/uploads/2010/01/iceberg-1.jpg) when icebergs come to mind but the ones the towing people like look more like this (http://marginalizedactiondinosaur.net/wordp/wp-content/uploads/2008/07/ice-sheet.JPEG) instead.

Date: 2011-02-19 06:20 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] agoodwinsmith.livejournal.com
I suppose it must be a viable economic option - I mean: we've filled tankers with oil and sent them around the world, so it must be worth it to do the same with water - assuming they scrub out the tankers first. But oil has been - what - $20 a barrel during most of that time, and buying a liter of gasoline less than a dollar. Hmm. I know we are willing to pay more than a dollar for a liter of drinking water under some circumstances, but I bet I don't pay that much for the water that flushes my toilet. How expensive would water really be this way?

I suppose we could use a combination of methods - ship the melty bergs to the coast, pipe them uphill, use the water, and then recycle the water in situ and never let it back into the ecosystem.

Profile

agoodwinsmith: (Default)
agoodwinsmith

March 2026

S M T W T F S
12 34567
8 9101112 1314
15161718192021
222324 25 262728
293031    

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Apr. 12th, 2026 10:58 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios